Journal of Intellectual Property (J Intellect Property; JIP)

KCI Indexed
OPEN ACCESS, PEER REVIEWED

pISSN 1975-5945
eISSN 2733-8487
Research Article

Study on the Patent Act, Article 35, “Patents Granted to Unentitled Persons and Protection of Legitimate Right-Holders,” and Patent Act, Article 99-2, “Claim for Transfer of Patents”

1Professor, Sangmyung University, Republic of Korea
2Semiconductor Fabrication Equipment Examination Division, Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), Republic of Korea
3Attorney at Law, Legal Affairs Department, Korean Airline, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to Inbog Kong, E-mail: ibkong@nate.com

Volume 19, Number 1, Pages 1-16, March 2024.
Journal of Intellectual Property 2024;19(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.34122/jip.2024.19.1.1
Received on November 27, 2023, Revised on January 15, 2024, Accepted on February 29, 2024, Published on March 30, 2024.
Copyright © 2024 Korea Institute of Intellectual Property.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the article is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Abstract

This is a comparative study on various aspects of the Patent Act, Article 35, “Patents Granted to Unentitled Persons and Protection of Legitimate Right-Holders,”and Article 99-2, “Claim for Transfer of Patents,”both of which are aimed at protecting legitimate right-holder(s) against unentitled persons who are granted patents.

Although both articles have similar purposes, they differ in several aspects, particularly concerning the retroactive effects of recovered patent(s). Several precautions should be considered when choosing one of the remedies for protecting the legitimate right-holder(s) or recovering the patent(s).

For instance, if a patent right expires or is transferred during an action to claim the transfer of a patent, it can be highly disadvantageous to the plaintiff, possibly leading to dismissal of the claim. Therefore, filing a provisional injunction prohibiting the transfer or cancellation of patent rights, along with filing a legal action, is desirable.

Furthermore, patent rights transferred through a claim for the transfer of a patent take effect retroactively from the registration date,although not in an invalidation trial. Consequently, the scope of damages from patent infringement in an invalidation trial becomes relatively disadvantageous.

If one of the joint applicants makes an unauthorized application, the transfer of share ownership through a transfer claim is possible. However, invalidating only the shares through an invalidation trial is impossible.

On the other hand, an invalidation trial can be conducted not by the court but by the “Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board (IPTAB)”, with the advantage of allowing proceedings even after the expiration of rights and, providing an opportunity to correct the scope of claims after the decision has become final and conclusive.

Based on the above, considering such differences is necessary when choosing a remedy for patents to protect legitimate right-holder(s) or recover the patent(s). Furthermore, legislative consideration regarding the retroactive effect of patent rights registered under Article 35 of the Patent Act will be necessary in the future.

Keywords

Unentitled Person(s), Legitimate Right-Holder(s), Transfer of Patent(s), Retroactive effect, Jurisdiction, Compensation for damages, Preliminary injunction

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

The author received manuscript fees for this article from Korea Institute of Intellectual Property.

Section